"Angry in Oshawa" says...

“Angry in Oshawa” submitted the following comment to yesterday’s post.

Who originally brought up the question in council, and do you know who voted for/against the motion to put this on the ballot or for/against the idea in the first place? I would be interested to know.

Dear Angry

Thank you for your question.

The principal architect and driving force for putting this asinine referendum question was Nestor Pidwerbecki. His motion was seconded by Joe Kolodzie, interestingly the two oldest council members and perhaps the two who might find it increasinly difficult to perform and campaign for election with the energy required in ward elections, not to mention the energy throughout the term to look after their ward constituency concerns.

Their motion was despite the fact that there had been not been a whimper of public discontent for the ward system . It’s unfortunate that they were able to solicit council support to get the question on the ballot. Voting for the ballot question were Councillors Nestor Pidwerbecki, Brian Nicholson, Mike Nicholson, Cathy Clarke, John Neal, Joe Kolodzie, and April Cullen. Voting against were Mayor Gray, Councillors Robert Lutczyk, Tito-Dante Marimpietri, and Louise Parkes.

According to press reports, Pidwerbecki’s rationale for introducing the issue was: 1) Oshawa was growing too large for a ward system, 2) that a ward system council was too divisive and, 3) councilllors should have a city-wide mentality. Pidwerbecki is dead wrong on all counts and hopefully he brings less faulty thinking to his council votes. I suspect, though, that Pidwerbecki is smarter than this and that he is “stretching” to justify the unjustifiable.

Let’s analyze Pidwerbecki’s argument.

Oshawa is growing too large for a ward system---This is completely opposite from the truth. In reality, a general vote is only valid where the municipality is quite small and everyone knows each other. Using Pidwerbecki’s argument, Toronto’s council of 44 members representing 2.48 million people because of its vast size should be an obvious candidate for the general vote because he would argue it is too large for a ward system….ridiculous and absurd!

A Ward System Council is more divisive---How so? General vote politicians compete with each other at every meeting for press necessary to foster high name recognition. Therefore, they hog the floor and backbite, bitch, and bicker to steal the press. Ward politicians are not election competitors and have to be far more co-operative with their peers in order to gain support for the needs of their ward

A general vote promotes a city-wide mentality---Not so! A general vote politician gets elected through high name recognition and thus promoting themselves at the expense of real productivity becomes job one for general vote politicians. A ward vote politician gets elected through service to his/her constituents and so service to people becomes job one for a ward politicians. Ward politicians have to develop positive relations with their fellow politicians to get support for any of their ward initiatives. The very nature of co-operation leads to politicians working together to set priorities for the betterment of the city.

The general vote cannot be justified on any grounds for a municipality the size of Oshawa, It is obvious Pidwerbecki is stretching for straws trying to justify the unjustifiable…Don’t let him pull the wool over your eyes.

Councillor Pidwerbecki has been involved in politics for a long time. When we got the ward system in 1985, Pidwerbecki was quoted in the press as saying, “They are going to have to break up the country club and it is going to be the best thing that ever happened to Oshawa. How can I describe our feelings,” he continued, “we’re elated.” He said up to now Council had been composed of people who have had enough money to afford the high price tag of a general election campaign. “Now people who are relatively unknown may figure they have a chance where there was none before,” he said. “Instead of spending a lot of money to cover the whole city, they can now concentrate on one area and reduce the cost factor.” Describing the then “General Vote” Council as an “elite group”, Pidwerbecki said he expects some new faces on council after the next municipal election in November.

Pidwerbecki knows the value of ward elections but has changed his tune now that he is a member of council. His bringing up a return to the general vote can be no less than self serving in insuring his re-election.

Self serving politicians deserve neither our respect or support. Councillor Pidwerbecki will undoubtedly be #1 on our hit list for politicians to be defeated in the next election. We will organize his ward to ensure this. We are keeping our options open on other council members to see how they vote on the Bylaw that has to be introduced before a change. We shall appeal this bylaw to the OMB and have every expectation of a “slam dunk” win.