FOR MAYOR---SELECT ONE
John GRAY
Dawn TURNER
Alexander William KEMP
FOR LOCAL COUNCIL ONLY---SELECT UP TO THREE
Doug BAIN
John C. BURNS
Dave CHYZNAK
Tim DOBSON
Robert GOHEEN
Doug HAWKINS
Michael KETTELA
Kyle NICHOLSON
Tito-Dante MARIEMPIETRI
Johnny MILOSH
Louise V. PARKES
Maryanne SHOULDRA
Dave THOMPSON
FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL COUNCIL---SELECT UP TO SEVEN
Pauline BEAL
Cathy CLARKE
April CULLEN
Mary Jo CUNHA
John HENRY
Steven GAMSBY
Lanny JOSEPH
Joseph KOLODZIE
Robert LUTCZYK
LynneMarie McCARTHY
John NEAL
Brian NICHOLSON
Mike NICHOLSON
Nestor PIDWERBECKI
David PURDY
Doug ROSS
John RZESNUT
Bruce SMITH
Murray STRONG
Doug TERWILLEGAR
Gord VICKERS
Yoge PATEL
TRUSTEE, DURHAM REGION SCHOOL BOARD---SELECT UP TO THREE
Michael BARRETT
David C. CONWAY
Margo E. HAWKINS
Kathleen Ann HOPPER
Larry JACULA
Julia McCREA
Ken PARKS
Bill PATTERSON
Susan SHETLER
Pamela VERHAGEN
Does this make sense to you? We have to turn around Council’s ludicrous move to implement a general vote….just to insure their lifetime seats on council. That is the only reason why this move is being put forward. Voters are more likely to select names they've heard of, the members of council, whose names are regularly in the press. That is why politicians will argue, backbite, bitch, and bicker to get the press to "grow" their name recognition. As every council member is a competitor for votes under the "at-large" general vote, they will be reluctant to support council peers with good ideas that is likely to provide them press. The result? Council stagnates into a "do-nothing" government as happened under Oshawa's past with the General Vote prior to 1985. We can't let Council turn back the hands of time to the devastation of a General Vote.
If you demand a stop to this council "self-serving" nonsense, then write the mayor and council and tell them so. The link is on the right sidebar and any letter addressed to the mayor and council has to be accepted by council and appears in the official minutes of Oshawa City Council. Letters to individual members are unofficial and can be disposed of with no record of your concern.
We need a system that serves the city and its people, not the politicians!
4 comments:
And, to think....
People were ALREADY complaining this past election about the amount of signs and campaign liturature that came around during the elections...
Now, let's look at the averages. From using an average of 3 regional candidates per ward (22 in total) and 5 local candidates per ward. Instead of recieving propaganda from the 3 mayoral candidates, 3 Regional candidates, and 5 Local Candidates, we will NOW recieve material from the 3 Mayoral Candidates, as well as ALL FOURTEEN Local Candidates, and ALL TWENTY-TWO, yes, that's right, ALL TWENTY-TWO Regional Candidates!
So, that means that you, the people of Oshawa, will have to make your choices, based on seeing a few flyers from THIRTY-NINE DIFFERENT CANDIDATES IN THE ELECTION!!!
Why is it that there are some out there that ACTUALLY belive this is better? Ironically enough, their reasons are simple and selfish.
They know that there are certain entrenched politicians in this city, that THEY HAVE A PERSONAL AGENDA AGAINST.
Now, they choose to ignore the fact that they cannot vote for nor against that person or persons, because they do not live in the wards in question, so they think the only way to get these people out is to make them run city wide, instead of having them focus on wards.
What they FAIL TO REALIZE (shockingly), is that the reasons that they dislike these people, are because these particular politicians, are doing EXACTLY WHAT IT IS THAT THEIR CONSTINTUANTS HAVE ELECTED THEM TO DO!
Realistically, the day that ANY of these politicians FAIL to represent the people of their ward in the manner that is expected, they find themselves unemployed. It happens to them all! So, why is the change from Ward System to General Vote needed?
In fact, what everyone seems to be missing, is that Oshawa OVERWHELMINGLY supported the Ward system when it was first introduced in the 1980's, and as such, WHY WAS IT EVEN BROUGHT UP IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Anonymous has made some very good points. Too bad he/she didn't provide his/her name to give these comments far more weight. This comment will find it's way to the main posting page---hopefully the author won't mind!
Apologies, it was my post, I am usually signed in automatically...
Bob Graham.
Thanks Bob...this will be published on main posting tonight.
Post a Comment